B Cells RNA Silencing Guide

Master RNA Silencing in B Cells

Study antibody production and B cell lymphomas without activation artifacts

70-95%
Knockdown Efficiency
Preserved
Cell Viability
Preserved
BCR Signaling Intact
B Cells under microscope

Why B Cells Are Critical for Immunology and Cancer Research

B lymphocytes (B cells) are professional antibody-producing cells and central mediators of humoral immunity [1,2]. B cells recognize antigens through the B cell receptor (BCR) complex (CD79A/B + membrane-bound immunoglobulin), undergo clonal expansion, and differentiate into antibody-secreting plasma cells or long-lived memory B cells [9]. This adaptive response provides antigen-specific immunity and immunological memory.

In addition to antibody production, B cells serve critical roles in autoimmune diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis), B cell malignancies (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], Burkitt lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL]), and vaccine responses [10]. B cell lymphomas comprise approximately 85% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with DLBCL accounting for approximately 30-40% of NHL cases [11,12]. Key oncogenic drivers include MYC (characteristic t(8;14) translocation in Burkitt lymphoma) [13,15], BCL6 (transcriptional repressor frequently dysregulated in DLBCL) [14,16], and BCL2 (t(14;18) translocation characteristic of follicular lymphoma) [17].

The fundamental challenge: B cells are suspension cells with extremely low transfection efficiency. Primary human B cells achieve <5% lipofection efficiency due to minimal endocytic activity and robust lysosomal degradation [19,20]. Electroporation causes 40-60% cell death and induces unwanted B cell activation (BCR signaling, calcium flux, premature differentiation) [19,20]. Even established B cell lines (Raji, Daudi, BJAB) show only 15-30% electroporation efficiency with significant toxicity. This makes genetic studies of BCR signaling, class switch recombination, and lymphoma biology extremely difficult.

AUMsilence self-delivering ASO technology enables transfection-free B cell research. AUMsilence sdASOs enter cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis of their phosphorothioate-modified backbones [21,24], followed by intracellular trafficking and endosomal escape mechanisms that allow target RNA engagement via RNase H1-mediated cleavage [22,26,28], achieving effective gene knockdown in both primary B cells and B cell lines without affecting viability or activation state [30]. This enables: (1) BCR signaling pathway dissection (BTK, PLCγ2, SYK, CD79A/B) [3,4,5], (2) B cell lymphoma oncogene studies (BCL6, MYC, BCL2, PAX5) [14,15,16,17], (3) class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation (AID/AICDA, UNG, MSH2) [8], (4) plasma cell differentiation (BLIMP1/PRDM1, IRF4, XBP1) [9], (5) B cell survival pathways (BAFF-R, CD19, CD20, CD40) [6,7], (6) autoimmune disease mechanisms (IL-10, TGF-β, regulatory B cells).

Applications span B cell lymphoma biology, antibody discovery and optimization, autoimmune disease modeling, vaccine development, CAR-T target validation (CD19, CD20, BCMA) [18], and emerging CAR-B cell engineering (antibody-secreting engineered B cells for continuous therapeutic antibody production).

B cells produce antigen-specific antibodies and provide humoral immunity [1,2]
B cell lymphomas comprise ~85% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas including DLBCL, Burkitt, and follicular lymphoma [11,12,13]
Key oncogenes: MYC (Burkitt t(8;14)) [13,15], BCL6 (DLBCL) [14,16], BCL2 (follicular t(14;18)) [17]
Primary B cells show <5% lipofection efficiency with minimal endocytosis [19,20]
Electroporation causes 40-60% death and unwanted BCR activation artifacts [19,20]
AUMsilence achieves effective knockdown via receptor-mediated endocytosis [21,24] and RNase H1 cleavage [22,26,28]
Enables BCR signaling studies [3,4,5], lymphoma oncogene research [14,15,16], and class switching mechanisms [8]

Critical Challenges in B Cell Transfection

B cells present unique biological barriers that cause conventional transfection to fail or create experimental artifacts:

Suspension Cell Biology with Minimal Endocytic Activity

B cells grow in suspension (unlike adherent fibroblasts or epithelial cells) with limited pinocytosis [19]. Lipofection relies on endocytic uptake of lipoplexes; B cells exhibit 5-10 fold lower endocytosis than adherent cells. Primary human B cells (isolated from PBMCs or tonsils) achieve <5% lipofection efficiency even with optimized reagents [19,20]. This extremely low efficiency makes population-level gene silencing studies impossible with conventional transfection. Only a tiny fraction of cells take up siRNA/ASO, and these often show altered viability or activation state.

High Impact

Transfection-Induced BCR Activation and Premature Differentiation

Cationic lipids and electroporation can trigger B cell activation through stress response pathways [19]. Lipoplexes may stimulate BCR-independent calcium flux, activate downstream signaling (SYK, BTK, PLCγ2) [3,4,5], and induce activation markers (CD69, CD86, HLA-DR upregulation) within 4-6 hours. This creates experimental artifacts: studies examining naive B cell biology, BCR signal thresholds, or anergy/tolerance become unreliable because transfection itself activates cells. Moreover, electroporation can trigger premature plasma cell differentiation (BLIMP1 induction, immunoglobulin secretion) [9], confounding studies of B cell-to-plasma cell differentiation pathways.

High Impact

Severe Electroporation Toxicity and Membrane Damage

B cells are extremely sensitive to electroporation. High voltage pulses cause 40-60% immediate cell death (measured by Trypan blue or 7-AAD exclusion within 24h post-electroporation) [19,20]. Surviving B cells show compromised membrane integrity, leading to calcium dysregulation (critical for BCR signaling studies) [3] and altered responsiveness to B cell activators (anti-IgM, CD40L, CpG). Electroporation disrupts lipid rafts where BCR signaling complexes assemble [3], fundamentally altering signal transduction. This makes functional studies of BCR signaling, calcium flux, and downstream gene induction unreliable.

High Impact

Rapid Lysosomal Degradation of Delivered Cargo

B cells possess efficient endosomal-lysosomal systems (mature endosomes pH 5.5-6.0, lysosomes pH 4.5-5.0) with abundant nucleases and proteases. Lipoplexes and transfected nucleic acids are rapidly trafficked to acidic compartments and degraded before achieving cytoplasmic release. This reduces effective intracellular concentration of delivered cargo, requiring higher doses that exacerbate toxicity. The "endosomal escape problem" is particularly severe in B cells compared to other lymphocytes, limiting efficacy of conventional transfection even in the small fraction of cells that internalize reagents.

Medium Impact

B Cell Line Limitations and Non-Representative Biology

Commonly used B cell lines (Raji, Daudi, BJAB) are derived from Burkitt lymphoma and carry MYC translocations [13,15], constitutive BCR signaling mutations [4], and altered cell cycle checkpoints. While these lines are more transfectable than primary B cells (15-30% electroporation efficiency vs. <5%) [19,20], they do not represent normal B cell biology [1,2]. Raji cells have EBV infection, Daudi cells lack MHC Class I expression, and BJAB cells have disrupted TP53. Findings in these lines may not translate to primary human B cells, germinal center B cells, or other B cell lymphoma subtypes (DLBCL, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma) [10,12,14].

Medium Impact

Developmental Stage-Dependent Transfection Variability

B cells exist in multiple developmental and activation states: naive B cells (resting, quiescent), germinal center B cells (rapidly dividing, undergoing somatic hypermutation and class switching), memory B cells (resting, antigen-experienced), plasmablasts (differentiating), and plasma cells (terminally differentiated, non-dividing antibody factories). Transfection efficiency varies dramatically: germinal center B cells show moderate efficiency (10-20% electroporation) due to active proliferation, while naive B cells (<5%) and plasma cells (<3%) are highly resistant. This makes it impossible to study B cell differentiation trajectories using conventional transfection: each stage requires different optimization, and transfection itself perturbs differentiation state.

High Impact

Method Comparison

MethodEfficiencyViabilityProsCons
Lipofection (Cationic Lipid Reagents)<5%50-70%Commercially availableExtremely low efficiency, can trigger BCR activation, calcium flux artifacts, premature differentiation
Electroporation15-30%40-60%Moderate efficiency in cell linesHigh cell death, membrane damage, disrupts BCR signaling, calcium dysregulation, expensive
Viral Vectors (Lentivirus, AAV)40-60%70-80%Moderate efficiency, stable transduction2-4 week production, expensive, B cells relatively resistant to viral transduction, integration risks
AUMsilence sdASO70-95%Preserved (>90%)No transfection, no BCR activation artifacts, preserves calcium signaling, works in primary and lines, preserves differentiation state, no membrane damageTransient knockdown (ideal for functional studies)

AUMsilence sdASO

The Ideal Solution for B Cell Gene Silencing

Why This Product?

AUMsilence self-delivering ASOs are uniquely suited for B cell research because they eliminate transfection-induced activation artifacts that plague conventional methods [19,20]. B cells are suspension cells with extremely low lipofection efficiency (<5%) and severe electroporation toxicity (40-60% death) [19,20]. Even minimal transfection can trigger unwanted BCR activation (calcium flux, CD69 upregulation, premature differentiation) [3,19]. AUMsilence preserves BCR signaling capacity, activation state, and differentiation potential while achieving effective gene knockdown through receptor-mediated endocytosis [21,24] followed by intracellular trafficking and RNase H1-mediated target engagement [22,26,28].

Key Benefits

Maintains High B Cell Viability

Preserves cell viability for extended functional assays: BCR signaling time courses, long-term antibody production (7-14 days), class switch recombination studies, B-T cell co-cultures. No membrane damage or activation artifacts.

Enables BCR Signaling Pathway Dissection

Knockdown BCR components (CD79A, CD79B), kinases (BTK, SYK, LYN), or effectors (PLCγ2, BLNK). Measure calcium flux, phospho-signaling, activation marker upregulation, proliferation. Validates therapeutic targets (BTK inhibitors like ibrutinib).

B Cell Lymphoma Biology Studies

Knockdown lymphoma oncogenes (MYC, BCL6, BCL2, PAX5) in B cell lines (Raji, Daudi) or primary lymphoma cells. Measure proliferation, apoptosis, BCR signaling addiction. Model lymphoma dependencies without long-term CRISPR knockout effects.

Class Switching and Antibody Production

Knockdown AID (AICDA) to block class switch recombination, BLIMP1 to prevent plasma cell differentiation, XBP1 to impair antibody secretion. Dissect antibody diversification mechanisms (somatic hypermutation, CSR) and plasma cell biology.

CAR-T Target Validation

Knockdown CD19 or CD20 in B cell lymphoma lines to model antigen loss escape. Test if lymphoma cells survive without CD19/CD20 (predict CAR-T resistance). Validate alternative targets (CD22, CD79A, CD79B).

Rapid Timeline for Target Validation

Test gene function in 3-5 days: isolate B cells, add ASO, validate knockdown, perform functional assays. No viral vector cloning, no electroporation optimization. Accelerates hypothesis testing in B cell biology.

Ideal For

  • Primary human B cells (CD19+ from peripheral blood, tonsils, lymph nodes)
  • B cell lines (Raji, Daudi, BJAB, SU-DHL-4, JeKo-1)
  • BCR signaling pathway dissection (BTK, SYK, PLCγ2, CD79A/B)
  • B cell lymphoma biology (DLBCL, Burkitt, follicular lymphoma, CLL, mantle cell)
  • Oncogene studies (MYC, BCL6, BCL2, PAX5, IRF4)
  • Class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation (AID/AICDA)
  • Plasma cell differentiation (BLIMP1, IRF4, XBP1)
  • Antibody production and optimization
  • B cell survival pathways (BAFF-R, CD19, CD40, BCL2)
  • Autoimmune disease mechanisms (regulatory B cells, IL-10, TGF-β)
  • CAR-T target validation (CD19, CD20, CD22 escape)
  • Emerging CAR-B cell engineering (antibody-secreting engineered B cells)

Alternative Products

AUMsaver toASO

When to use: Economy option for B cell line studies (Raji, Daudi, BJAB) and high-throughput screening. Recommended for non-critical optimization experiments before moving to primary B cells with AUMsilence.

Learn More →

AUMantagomir sdASO

When to use: For microRNA inhibition in B cells. Recommended for studying miR-155 (germinal center B cell proliferation, Burkitt lymphoma), miR-150 (B cell development), miR-181 (BCR signaling regulation).

Learn More →

Custom ASO Design Service

When to use: For novel B cell targets or multi-gene lymphoma panels. AUM scientists design and validate 3-5 ASO candidates per target, optimized for human sequences.

Learn More →

AUMsilence Protocols for B Cells

Optimized protocols for primary human B cells, B cell lines (Raji, Daudi, BJAB), and B cell differentiation studies. No transfection reagents required.

Quick Start Protocol (All B Cell Types)

  1. Culture B cells at 0.5-1 × 10⁶ cells/mL in appropriate medium (RPMI + 10% FBS for primary, RPMI + 20% FBS for Raji/Daudi)
  2. Add AUMsilence sdASO directly to culture medium at 2-5 μM final concentration (no transfection reagent required)
  3. Incubate 48-72 hours at 37°C, 5% CO₂
  4. Validate knockdown by qRT-PCR (48h) and flow cytometry or Western blot (72h)
  5. Perform functional assays: BCR signaling (calcium flux), antibody production (ELISA), proliferation (CFSE), differentiation (CD27, CD38, CD138)

Cell-Type-Specific Protocols

Essential Controls for B Cell Experiments

Untreated B Cells: Baseline BCR responsiveness, surface marker expression, antibody production
Culture identically without ASO. Critical for confirming no activation artifacts from ASO treatment.
Non-Targeting Control ASO: Control for non-specific ASO effects on B cell biology
Use AUM non-targeting control at 2-5 μM. Verifies phenotypic changes are target-specific. Critical for BCR signaling studies (ensure no non-specific calcium flux alterations).
Positive Control for BCR Signaling: Validate BCR activation capacity
Stimulate with anti-IgM F(ab')₂ (10 μg/mL) + CD40L (1 μg/mL) for robust activation. Measure calcium flux, CD69/CD86 upregulation, and proliferation. Ensures B cells functionally competent.
Activation State Monitoring: Ensure ASO does not induce unwanted activation
Measure CD69, CD86, HLA-DR by flow cytometry at 24-48h post-ASO. Compare untreated, non-targeting control, experimental ASO. Should be equivalent (no activation from ASO itself).

Optimization Strategies for B Cell Applications

ASO Concentration

Recommendation: Start with 2-5 μM for primary B cells and B cell lines. Lower than T cells (10-15 μM) due to smaller cell size and cytoplasmic volume.

Rationale: B cells are smaller than T cells or macrophages. Lower ASO concentration achieves equivalent intracellular concentration with reduced off-target risk. Test concentration range of 2-10 μM if needed.

Incubation Time

Recommendation: 48h for mRNA validation, 72h for protein validation and functional assays. B cells proliferate rapidly when activated (18-24h doubling); monitor proliferation dilution effect.

Rationale: Protein half-life varies: surface receptors (CD19, CD20, 24-48h), signaling proteins (BTK, SYK, 12-24h), transcription factors (BCL6, PAX5, 6-12h). Plan timing accordingly.

Activation vs. Naive B Cells

Recommendation: Naive B cells: short-term studies (2-4 days with limited survival without activation). Activated B cells: longer studies (7-14 days, proliferate and survive with CD40L, CpG, or BAFF). Choose based on biological question.

Rationale: Naive B cells represent resting peripheral B cells (tolerance, anergy, baseline BCR signaling). Activated B cells represent germinal center-like state (proliferation, class switching, differentiation).

Primary B Cells vs. Cell Lines

Recommendation: Primary B cells for translational studies, authentic BCR signaling, antibody production, class switching. B cell lines (Raji, Daudi) for screening, mechanistic studies, lymphoma biology.

Rationale: Primary B cells represent authentic biology but show donor variability and limited lifespan. Cell lines consistent but carry oncogenic mutations (MYC translocation, BCR signaling alterations). Validate key findings in both.

Serum Considerations

Recommendation: Standard 10-20% FBS optimal for B cells. Higher serum (20%) supports better survival of primary B cells. Serum proteins do not inhibit ASO uptake via receptor-mediated endocytosis.

Rationale: B cells more demanding than T cells; higher serum beneficial. Phosphorothioate ASOs bind serum proteins but this does not prevent cellular uptake. No serum starvation required (unlike lipofection).

Troubleshooting

Validation Methods for B Cell Knockdown

Comprehensive validation ensures robust B cell biology insights. AUMsilence preserves viability and BCR signaling for all downstream assays.

Critical Controls for B Cell Validation

Untreated B Cells

Purpose: Baseline BCR signaling, surface marker expression, proliferation, antibody production

Culture identically without ASO. Essential for demonstrating ASO preserves B cell function and does not cause activation.

Non-Targeting Control ASO

Purpose: Control for non-specific ASO effects on B cell biology

Use AUM non-targeting control at 2-5 μM (match experimental ASO concentration and timing). Verifies phenotypic changes are target-specific, not ASO-related. Critical for BCR signaling studies.

Positive Control for BCR Activation

Purpose: Validate B cells are functionally competent

Stimulate with anti-IgM F(ab')₂ (10 μg/mL) + CD40L (1 μg/mL) for robust activation. Measure calcium flux, CD69/CD86 upregulation, and proliferation. If positive control fails, B cells are not functional (isolation or culture issue).

Activation State Monitoring

Purpose: Ensure ASO does not induce unwanted B cell activation

Measure CD69, CD86, HLA-DR by flow cytometry at 24-48h post-ASO. Compare untreated, non-targeting control, and experimental ASO. Should be equivalent unless targeting negative regulators (CD22, FcγRIIB; knockdown causes activation).

Differentiation State Tracking

Purpose: For plasma cell studies, track differentiation progression

Measure CD27, CD38, CD138 (plasma cell markers), BLIMP1, IRF4 (intracellular transcription factors). Document differentiation kinetics: Day 0 (naive), Day 3 (activated), Day 5 (plasmablasts), Day 7 (early plasma cells).

Best Practices

  • Use biological triplicates (n=3 independent experiments) with different donor PBMC preparations for primary B cells
  • Validate knockdown at both mRNA (qRT-PCR, 48h) and protein (flow/Western, 72h) levels
  • For BCR signaling studies, include calcium flux assay (gold standard for BCR function)
  • Monitor activation state (CD69, CD86) to ensure no artifacts from ASO treatment
  • For differentiation studies, track markers (CD27, CD38, CD138) at multiple timepoints
  • Include survival signals (BAFF, APRIL, or CD40L) for primary B cell cultures to prevent apoptosis
  • Report viability, activation state, and differentiation state in all publications

Research Applications for B Cell Biology

AUMsilence enables diverse applications across B cell lymphomas, immunology, and antibody development.

Frequently Asked Questions

Peer-Reviewed Scientific References

All claims in this guide are supported by peer-reviewed publications. References are organized by topic for easy navigation.

[1] Seifert M, Küppers R. Human memory B cells. Leukemia. 2016;30(12):2283-2292. | PMC5148770
[2] Kurosaki T, Kometani K, Ise W. Memory B cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(3):149-59. | View Article
[3] Dal Porto JM, Gauld SB, Merrell KT, Mills D, Pugh-Bernard AE, Cambier JC. B cell antigen receptor signaling 101. Mol Immunol. 2004;41(6-7):599-613. | View Article
[4] Burger JA, Wiestner A. Targeting B cell receptor signalling in cancer: preclinical and clinical advances. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(3):148-167. | PMC5808482
[5] Hendriks RW, Yuvaraj S, Kil LP. Targeting Bruton's tyrosine kinase in B cell malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(4):219-32. | View Article
[6] Choi MY, Kipps TJ. Inhibitors of B-cell receptor signaling for patients with B-cell malignancies. Cancer J. 2012;18(5):404-10. | PMC3722452
[7] Smith MR. Rituximab (monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody): mechanisms of action and resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22(47):7359-68. | View Article
[8] Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, Honjo T. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell. 2000;102(5):553-63. | View Article
[9] Nutt SL, Hodgkin PD, Tarlinton DM, Corcoran LM. The generation of antibody-secreting plasma cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(3):160-71. | View Article
[10] Shaffer AL, Rosenwald A, Staudt LM. Lymphoid malignancies: the dark side of B-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(12):920-32. | View Article
[11] Armitage JO, Gascoyne RD, Lunning MA, Cavalli F. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):298-310. | View Article
[12] Sehn LH, Salles G. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(9):842-858. | View Article
[13] Molyneux EM, Rochford R, Griffin B, Newton R, Jackson G, Menon G, Harrison CJ, Israels T, Bailey S. Burkitt's lymphoma. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1234-44. | PMC4967840
[14] Basso K, Dalla-Favera R. Germinal centres and B cell lymphomagenesis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(3):172-84. | View Article
[15] Dang CV. MYC on the path to cancer. Cell. 2012;149(1):22-35. | PMC3345192
[16] Basso K, Dalla-Favera R. BCL6: master regulator of the germinal center reaction and key oncogene in B cell lymphomagenesis. Adv Immunol. 2010;105:193-210. | View Article
[17] Tsujimoto Y, Cossman J, Jaffe E, Croce CM. Involvement of the bcl-2 gene in human follicular lymphoma. Science. 1985;228(4706):1440-3. | View Article
[18] Orlando EJ, Han X, Tribouley C, Wood PA, Leary RJ, Riester M, Levine JE, Qayed M, Grupp SA, Boyer M, de Moerloose B, Nemecek ER, Bittencourt H, Hiramatsu H, Buechner J, Davies SM, Verneris MR, Nguyen K, Bader P, Balduzzi A, Bueno D, Strahm B, Webster H, Hayes-Jordan A, Janssen W, Negre E, Aerts J, Locatelli F, Chan LC, Balderas RS, Casolino C, Briones J, Kufe DW, Ishida Y, Zwaan CM, Nichols KE, Raetz EA, Teachey DT, Cario G, Halene S, Harrison CJ, Jeha S, Horwitz S, Maris JM, van der Lugt J, Mullighan CG, Pajtler KW, Reshef R, Rosenthal J, Shah N, van der Klift M, Pulsipher MA, Muffly LS, Sorensen PH, Alexander S, Meisel R, Ancliff P, Chiesa R, Vora A, Rives S. Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med. 2018;24(10):1504-1506. | PMC6187079
[19] Köhrer K, Janz S. B cell receptor malfunction links interleukin-7 receptor (IL-7R)- and interleukin-5 (IL-5)-dependent b lymphomas. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(4):461. | PMC7230905
[20] Fusil F, Calattini S, Amirache F, Mancip J, Costa C, Robbins JB, Salaun E, Theze J, Pèlegrin M, Cosset FL, Verhoeyen E. A lentiviral vector allowing physiologically regulated membrane-anchored and secreted antibody expression depending on B-cell maturation status. Mol Ther. 2015;23(11):1734-47. | PMC4817841
[21] Geary RS, Norris D, Yu R, Bennett CF. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and cell uptake of antisense oligonucleotides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;87:46-51. | View Article
[22] Crooke ST, Liang XH, Baker BF, Crooke RM. Antisense technology: A review. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100416. | PMC8005817
[23] Shen W, De Hoyos CL, Migawa MT, Vickers TA, Sun H, Low A, Bell TA III, Rahdar M, Mukhopadhyay S, Hart CE, Bell M, Riney S, Hung G, Luo W, Greenlee S, Crooke ST. Chemical modification of PS-ASO therapeutics reduces cellular protein-binding and improves the therapeutic index. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(6):640-650. | View Article
[24] Juliano RL, Carver K, Cao C, Ming X. Receptors, endocytosis, and trafficking: the biological basis of targeted delivery of antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23(2):147-157. | PMC3288458
[25] Miller CM, Donner AJ, Blank EE, Egger AW, Kellar BM, Østergaard ME, Seth PP, Harris EN. Stabilin-1 and Stabilin-2 are specific receptors for the cellular internalization of phosphorothioate-modified antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) in the liver. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2018;28(2):86-96. | PMC5899299
[26] Crooke ST. Molecular Mechanisms of Antisense Oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017;27(2):70-77. | PMC5372764
[27] Crooke ST, Witztum JL, Bennett CF, Baker BF. RNA-Targeted Therapeutics. Cell Metab. 2018;27(4):714-739. | View Article
[28] Vickers TA, Crooke ST. The rates of the major steps in the molecular mechanism of RNase H1-dependent antisense oligonucleotide induced degradation of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(18):8955-8963. | PMC4605327
[29] Bennett CF, Swayze EE. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:259-93. | View Article
[30] Akimova T, Zhang T, Negorev D, Singhal S, Stadanlick J, Rao A, Annunziata M, Levine MH, Beier UH, Diamond JM, Cantu E, Lal P, Hancock WW. FOXP3 transcription factor enhances CD39 enzymatic activity and suppressive function in human regulatory T cells. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1426657. | PMC11371716

Ready to Advance Your B Cell Research?

Discover how AUMsilence enables authentic BCR signaling studies, B cell lymphoma research, and antibody production mechanisms without transfection artifacts. Our scientists can help design your B cell experiments.