NK Cells & CAR-NK Cells RNA Silencing Guide

Master RNA Silencing in NK & CAR-NK Cells

Engineer enhanced cytotoxicity and checkpoint resistance without transfection

Yes
Transfection-Free
Yes
Preserves Viability
Yes
CAR-NK Compatible
NK Cells & CAR-NK Cells under microscope

Why NK Cells and CAR-NK Cells Are Critical for Cancer Immunotherapy

Natural killer (NK) cells are innate lymphocytes that provide rapid cytotoxic responses against virally infected cells and tumor cells without prior sensitization. Unlike T cells (which require MHC-restricted antigen presentation), NK cells recognize target cells through a balance of activating receptors (NKG2D, DNAM-1, natural cytotoxicity receptors including NKp30, NKp44, and NKp46) and inhibitory receptors (KIR family, NKG2A/CD94 heterodimer, TIGIT) [8,11]. This "missing self" and "stress-induced self" recognition allows NK cells to kill MHC Class I-deficient tumor cells that escape T cell surveillance [8,11].

CAR-NK cells combine the innate targeting capacity of NK cells with engineered chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), creating a powerful off-the-shelf cell therapy platform. Advantages over CAR-T cells include: no graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) risk (enabling allogeneic use), shorter lifespan (reduced CRS risk but requiring consideration for durability), multi-modal killing (CAR-dependent AND innate NK cell mechanisms), and established cell line platforms (NK-92, KHYG-1, NKL) for scalable manufacturing [10,15,17].

The fundamental challenge: NK cells are exceptionally resistant to transfection. Primary NK cells achieve only 3-15% lipofection efficiency (often below 5%) with 40-60% cell death [7,16]. Electroporation causes substantial cytotoxicity (25-50% death with optimized protocols) and fundamentally alters NK cell function: disrupting granule polarization [2,3,5], reducing cytotoxic capacity, and causing premature activation [7,14]. Even NK-92 cell line shows 30-50% electroporation death [14], limiting genetic engineering approaches.

AUMsilence self-delivering ASO technology enables transfection-free NK cell enhancement. AUMsilence sdASOs utilize proprietary chemical modifications that enable cellular uptake without any transfection reagents [19]. Once inside cells, they engage target RNA through Watson-Crick base pairing and recruit RNase H1 for RNA degradation [19]. This transfection-free mechanism has been demonstrated to achieve substantial gene knockdown in difficult-to-transfect immune cells including regulatory T cells [19], and is designed for NK cell applications with target-specific optimization. Knockdown efficiency and optimal concentration require empirical validation for each target. This enables: (1) checkpoint modulation to silence NKG2A (KLRC1), TIGIT, or PD-1 to enhance anti-tumor responses [6,8,11], (2) exhaustion prevention to knockdown CIS (CISH, negative regulator of cytokine signaling) or TOX to maintain NK cell persistence [4,12,13,18], (3) CAR-NK optimization to combine checkpoint knockout with CAR expression for synergistic enhancement [10,15,17], (4) activating receptor studies to dissect NKG2D, DNAM-1, and NCR contributions to tumor recognition [8,11].

Applications span cancer immunotherapy (CAR-NK engineering, checkpoint blockade), viral immunity (CMV, influenza, HIV responses), basic immunology (activating/inhibitory receptor balance), and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) mechanism studies.

NK cells provide rapid innate cytotoxicity without MHC restriction or prior sensitization [8,11]
CAR-NK cells combine engineered targeting with innate killing: no GvHD risk, off-the-shelf potential [10,15,17]
NK cells use balance of activating (NKG2D, DNAM-1/CD226, NCRs: NKp30/NKp44/NKp46) and inhibitory (KIR family, NKG2A/CD94, TIGIT) receptors [8,11]
Primary NK cells show 3-15% lipofection efficiency (often below 5%) with 40-60% cell death [7,16]
Electroporation causes 25-50% NK cell death with optimized protocols and disrupts cytotoxic granule function [2,3,5,7,14]
AUMsilence enables transfection-free gene silencing in difficult-to-transfect immune cells [19]
Enables checkpoint blockade (NKG2A, TIGIT), exhaustion prevention (CIS, TOX), and CAR-NK engineering [4,6,8,10,11,12,13,15,17,18]

Critical Challenges in NK Cell Transfection

NK cells are among the most difficult immune cells to transfect, presenting unique biological barriers:

Extreme Transfection Resistance and Cell Death

Primary human NK cells achieve 3-15% lipofection efficiency (often below 5%) even with optimized protocols, and 40-60% of cells die within 24-48 hours post-transfection [7,16]. Electroporation causes substantial toxicity: 25-50% cell death with optimized protocols, with surviving cells showing aberrant morphology and reduced cytotoxic capacity [7,14,16]. This stems from NK cells' limited endocytic activity (suspension cells with minimal pinocytosis) and hypersensitivity to membrane perturbation. The small fraction of successfully transfected NK cells often show compromised function, making population-level studies impossible with conventional methods.

High Impact

Disruption of Cytotoxic Granule Polarization

NK cells kill targets by polarizing lytic granules (containing perforin and granzymes) toward the immunological synapse and releasing contents into target cells [2,3,5]. Electroporation can alter cytoskeletal dynamics and function, potentially affecting the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) and actin cytoskeleton required for granule trafficking. Post-electroporation NK cells can show reduced degranulation (CD107a surface expression) and impaired target cell killing [7,14]. This makes functional cytotoxicity assays unreliable and confounds studies of NK cell activation, synapse formation, and killing mechanisms.

High Impact

Premature Activation and Exhaustion

Transfection reagents trigger NK cell activation through multiple pathways: cationic lipids activate stress response signaling, electroporation causes calcium influx and degranulation in absence of target cells [7,14]. This premature activation leads to rapid exhaustion: upregulation of inhibitory receptors (TIGIT, PD-1, TIM-3), downregulation of activating receptors (NKG2D, DNAM-1/CD226, NCRs) [8,11], and metabolic dysfunction including impaired mitochondrial function. By the time functional assays are performed (24-72h post-transfection), NK cells are already exhausted and show reduced cytotoxicity independent of gene knockdown.

High Impact

Donor-to-Donor Variability in Primary NK Cells

Primary human NK cells exhibit substantial variability in transfection efficiency (5-30% range across donors) due to differences in CD56bright vs. CD56dim subset distribution, KIR repertoire diversity, and prior CMV exposure (CMV+ donors have more differentiated, transfection-resistant NK cells). This variability makes it nearly impossible to standardize protocols across multiple donor preparations. Even within single donors, NK cells are heterogeneous: CD56bright NK cells (10% of peripheral NK) are more cytokine-producing, while CD56dim NK cells (90%) are more cytotoxic, and these subsets respond differently to transfection.

Medium Impact

CAR-NK Manufacturing Compatibility

CAR-NK cell manufacturing requires combining viral CAR transduction with genetic enhancements (checkpoint knockout, cytokine pathway modulation). Adding electroporation-based gene editing creates a triple insult: (1) viral transduction stress, (2) electroporation toxicity, (3) activation-induced exhaustion during expansion. This stacked toxicity reduces manufacturing yield, extends timelines, and produces CAR-NK cells with suboptimal function. Regulatory requirements for off-the-shelf CAR-NK (GMP manufacturing, cryopreservation, quality control) are incompatible with high-toxicity transfection methods.

High Impact

NK-92 Cell Line Limitations

NK-92 is the most extensively studied NK cell line in clinical trials and the primary platform for CAR-NK development [10,15]. However, NK-92 cells show 30-50% electroporation death (better than primary NK but still substantial) and altered phenotype post-transfection (reduced CD16 expression, impaired ADCC) [14]. Moreover, NK-92 requires irradiation before infusion (cannot proliferate in vivo), limiting persistence. Genetic engineering must preserve NK-92's cytotoxic capacity while maintaining safety profile.

Medium Impact

Method Comparison

MethodEfficiencyViabilityProsCons
Lipofection (Cationic Lipid Reagents)3-15% (often <5%)40-60%Commercially availableExtremely low efficiency, massive cell death, disrupts cytotoxic function, premature activation
Electroporation20-40%50-75%Higher efficiency than lipofectionSubstantial cell death (25-50%), disrupts granule polarization, exhaustion, expensive, donor variability
Viral Vectors (Lentivirus, AAV)50-70%70-85%Moderate efficiency, stable transduction2-4 week production, expensive, innate immune activation, regulatory complexity for CAR-NK
AUMsilence sdASOTarget-dependent; empirical validation requiredPreserves cell health; target-dependentNo transfection, preserves cytotoxic function, works in primary and NK-92, compatible with CAR transduction, no premature activation, maintains granule polarizationTransient knockdown (ideal for functional studies and optimization); efficiency requires validation per target

AUMsilence sdASO

The Ideal Solution for NK Cell and CAR-NK Engineering

Why This Product?

AUMsilence self-delivering ASOs are uniquely suited for NK cell research because they eliminate transfection-induced toxicity that makes conventional NK cell genetic manipulation nearly impossible [7,14,16]. Primary NK cells show only 3-15% lipofection efficiency (often below 5%) with massive cell death [7,16], while electroporation causes 25-50% death and disrupts cytotoxic granule function [2,3,5,7,14]. AUMsilence enables transfection-free gene silencing in difficult-to-transfect immune cells [19], preserving cell viability and maintaining full cytotoxic capacity, enabling authentic checkpoint blockade, exhaustion prevention, and CAR-NK engineering studies. Knockdown efficiency is target-dependent and requires empirical validation for each application.

Key Benefits

Preserves NK Cell Viability

Transfection-free mechanism [19] preserves cell health for functional assays requiring viable, functional NK cells: cytotoxicity assays, long-term co-cultures, serial tumor rechallenge, in vivo xenograft models. Viability is target-dependent; empirical validation required.

Enables Checkpoint Blockade Studies

Silence inhibitory receptors (NKG2A/KLRC1 [1,6,8], TIGIT [8,11], PD-1, KIRs [8,11]) to model checkpoint blockade therapy. Measure enhanced tumor killing, increased IFN-γ production, improved persistence. Mimics clinical checkpoint antibodies (monalizumab anti-NKG2A [6]) with genetic validation.

Exhaustion Prevention for Enhanced Persistence

Knockdown CIS (CISH, enhances IL-15 signaling [4,12,13,18]), TOX (prevents exhaustion), or inhibitory cytokine receptors (TGFβR2, IL-10R). Enhancement magnitude is target and cell-type dependent; empirical validation required for each application.

CAR-NK Optimization Platform

Combine AUMsilence checkpoint knockout with viral CAR transduction for synergistic enhancement. No interference with CAR expression. Can add before, during, or after transduction depending on strategy.

Rapid Timeline for Target Validation

Test gene function in 3-5 days: isolate NK cells, add ASO, validate knockdown, perform functional assays. No viral vector cloning, no optimization of toxic transfection conditions. Accelerates hypothesis testing and target prioritization.

ADCC Mechanism Studies

Primary NK cells express CD16 (FcγRIII) for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. AUMsilence enables dissection of ADCC pathways: CD16 signaling components, activating receptor synergy, perforin/granzyme requirements. Preserved CD16 expression and ADCC function post-treatment.

Ideal For

  • Primary human NK cells (CD56+ from peripheral blood)
  • NK-92 cell line and variants (NK-92MI, NK-92-CD16)
  • CAR-NK cell engineering and optimization
  • Checkpoint blockade studies (NKG2A, TIGIT, PD-1, KIRs)
  • Exhaustion prevention (CIS/CISH, TOX knockdown)
  • Activating receptor function studies (NKG2D, DNAM-1, NCRs)
  • ADCC mechanism research (CD16, FcγR signaling)
  • Innate immunity and viral defense (CMV, influenza, HIV)
  • Cytotoxic granule biology (perforin, granzyme B, degranulation)
  • NK cell metabolic reprogramming
  • Off-the-shelf cell therapy development
  • NK cell exhaustion and tumor microenvironment resistance

Alternative Products

AUMantagomir sdASO

When to use: For microRNA inhibition in NK cells. Recommended for studying miR-155 (regulates NK cell maturation), miR-27a (targets perforin and granzyme B), and miR-150 (regulates c-Myb, important for NK development).

Learn More →

Custom ASO Design Service

When to use: For novel NK cell targets or CAR-NK enhancement panels. AUM scientists design and validate 3-5 ASO candidates per target, optimized for human sequences.

Learn More →

AUMsilence Protocols for NK and CAR-NK Cells

Optimized protocols for primary human NK cells, NK-92 cell line, and CAR-NK engineering. No transfection reagents required.

Quick Start Protocol (All NK Cell Types)

  1. Culture NK cells at 0.5-1 × 10⁶ cells/mL in appropriate medium (RPMI + IL-2 for primary NK, Alpha-MEM for NK-92)
  2. Add AUMsilence sdASO directly to culture at 10 μM (no transfection reagent)
  3. Incubate 48-72 hours at 37°C, 5% CO₂
  4. Validate knockdown by qRT-PCR (48h) and flow cytometry (72h)
  5. Perform functional assays: cytotoxicity (51Cr release or flow-based), degranulation (CD107a), IFN-γ production

Cell-Type-Specific Protocols

Essential Controls for NK Cell Experiments

Untreated NK Cells: Baseline cytotoxicity, receptor expression, degranulation capacity
Culture identically but without ASO addition. Critical for demonstrating no functional impairment from ASO treatment itself.
Non-Targeting Control ASO: Control for non-specific ASO effects on NK cell biology
Use AUM non-targeting control at 10 μM. Verifies target specificity and rules out innate immune activation from phosphorothioate backbone.
Positive Control Target (K562 or 721.221 Cells): Validate baseline NK cell cytotoxic function
K562 is MHC Class I-deficient chronic myelogenous leukemia line; highly sensitive to NK cell killing. 721.221 is HLA Class I-negative B-lymphoblastoid line. Use as positive control for cytotoxicity assays (typically >50% lysis at 10:1 E:T ratio, target and cell-type dependent).
Electroporation Comparison: Optional but powerful demonstration of AUMsilence advantage
Electroporate NK cells with control oligonucleotide. Measure viability (typically 25-50% death with optimized protocols) and cytotoxicity (often 40-60% reduction). Compare to AUMsilence (typically >95% viability, preserved function).

Optimization Strategies for NK Cell Applications

ASO Concentration

Recommendation: Start with 10 μM for primary NK cells. NK-92 may require only 5-10 μM. Test range: 5-15 μM.

Rationale: NK cells have moderate proliferation (slower than T cells, faster than macrophages). 10 μM provides optimal balance of knockdown efficiency and minimal off-target effects.

Incubation Time

Recommendation: 48h for mRNA validation, 72h for protein validation and functional assays. Can extend to 96h for long-lived proteins or serial tumor rechallenge assays.

Rationale: Protein half-life varies: surface receptors (NKG2A, TIGIT, 24-48h), cytotoxic proteins (perforin, granzyme B, 48-72h). Plan validation timing accordingly.

IL-2 and IL-15 Supplementation

Recommendation: Always maintain IL-2 (100-200 U/mL) throughout ASO treatment. For primary NK expansion, add IL-15 (10 ng/mL) for enhanced survival and proliferation.

Rationale: NK cells are cytokine-dependent. IL-2 maintains viability, IL-15 enhances expansion and function. Do NOT remove cytokines during ASO treatment.

Primary NK vs. NK-92 Selection

Recommendation: Primary NK cells for translational studies, donor-specific responses, ADCC assays (CD16+). NK-92 for mechanistic studies, screening, CAR-NK proof-of-concept.

Rationale: Primary NK cells represent authentic biology but show donor variability. NK-92 consistent but lacks CD16 (no ADCC) and requires irradiation for clinical use.

Combination with CAR Transduction

Recommendation: AUMsilence does NOT interfere with lentiviral or retroviral CAR transduction. Can add before (Day 2), during (Day 3-4), or after (Day 8-10) transduction depending on experimental goal.

Rationale: ASOs target endogenous genes, not viral vectors. Flexibility in timing allows testing different enhancement strategies.

Troubleshooting

Validation Methods for NK Cell Knockdown

Comprehensive validation ensures robust NK cell biology insights. AUMsilence preserves viability and function for all downstream assays.

Critical Controls for NK Cell Validation

Untreated NK Cells

Purpose: Baseline cytotoxicity, receptor expression, degranulation, IFN-γ production

Culture identically without ASO. Essential for demonstrating ASO preserves function.

Non-Targeting Control ASO

Purpose: Control for non-specific ASO effects

Use AUM non-targeting control at 10 μM. Verifies target specificity and rules out innate immune activation from phosphorothioate backbone. NK cells express TLR9 (recognizes unmethylated CpG); non-targeting control essential.

K562 or 721.221 Target Cells (Positive Control)

Purpose: Validate baseline NK cell function independent of checkpoint receptors

K562 is MHC Class I-deficient chronic myelogenous leukemia line, HLA-E-negative; no inhibitory signals through KIR or NKG2A. 721.221 is HLA Class I-negative B-lymphoblastoid line. Both highly sensitive to NK killing. Typically >50% lysis at 10:1 E:T ratio (cell-type dependent). If killing of these targets is reduced, NK cells may have intrinsic functional defect (not checkpoint-related).

Dose-Response and Sequence Verification

Purpose: Confirm concentration-dependent knockdown and target specificity

Test 5, 10, 15 μM ASO; knockdown should correlate. Design 3-5 independent ASO sequences targeting different regions; concordant phenotypes confirm on-target effect (gold standard for specificity).

Best Practices

  • Use biological replicates (n=3 independent experiments, different donor PBMCs for primary NK cells)
  • Validate knockdown at both mRNA (qRT-PCR, 48h) and protein (flow, 72h) levels
  • Maintain IL-2 throughout experiments (100-200 U/mL for survival)
  • For functional assays, verify knockdown in same cells used for assay (not separate aliquot)
  • Use low E:T ratios (1:1, 3:1) to detect enhancement; high ratios show ceiling effects
  • Include K562 positive control in all cytotoxicity assays (baseline NK function)
  • Report viability, cell number, and NK cell purity (CD56+CD3-) in all publications

Research Applications for NK Cell and CAR-NK Biology

AUMsilence enables diverse applications across cancer immunotherapy, innate immunity, and cell therapy engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Peer-Reviewed Scientific References

All claims in this guide are supported by peer-reviewed publications. References are organized by topic for easy navigation.

[1] Kabat J, Borrego F, Brooks A, Coligan JE. Role that each NKG2A immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif plays in mediating the human CD94/NKG2A inhibitory signal. J Immunol. 2002;169(4):1948-53. | View Article
[2] Mace EM, Wu WW, Ho T, Mann SS, Hsu HT, Orange JS. NK Cell Lytic Granules are Highly Motile at the Immunological Synapse and Require F-Actin for Post-degranulation Persistence. J Immunol. 2012;189(10):4870-4880. | View Article
[3] Krzewski K, Coligan JE. Microtubule-organizing center polarity and the immunological synapse: protein kinase C and beyond. Front Immunol. 2012;3:235. | View Article
[5] Kabanova A, Zurli V, Baldari CT. Signals Controlling Lytic Granule Polarization at the Cytotoxic Immune Synapse. Front Immunol. 2018;9:307. | View Article
[8] Sivori S, Vacca P, Del Zotto G, Munari E, Mingari MC, Moretta L. Human NK cells: surface receptors, inhibitory checkpoints, and translational applications. Cell Mol Immunol. 2019;16(5):430-441. | View Article
[11] Sivori S, Della Chiesa M, Carlomagno S, et al. Inhibitory Receptors and Checkpoints in Human NK Cells, Implications for the Immunotherapy of Cancer. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2156. | View Article
[4] Delconte RB, Shi W, Sakkal S, Kearney CJ, Cragg MS, Gasser S, Huntington ND. CIS is a potent checkpoint in NK cell-mediated tumor immunity. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(7):816-24. | View Article
[12] Zhu H, Blum RH, Bjordahl R, Gaidarova S, Rogers P, Lee TT, Abujarour R, Bonello GB, Wu J, Tsai PF, Earhart CA, Tan C, Geller N, Shen N, Tuininga K, Campbell M, Castiglioni P, Judo M, Girard-Guyonvarc'h C, Dunham K, Joulia S, Consiglio A, Ehrlich LIR, Davis WE, Kohn DB, Lee DA, Wada M, Valamehr B, Kaufman DS. Metabolic Reprograming via Deletion of CISH in Human iPSC-Derived NK Cells Promotes In Vivo Persistence and Enhances Anti-tumor Activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27(2):224-237.e6. | PMC7415618
[13] Daher M, Basar R, Gokdemir E, Baran N, Uprety N, Nunez Cortes AK, Mendt M, Kerbauy LN, Banerjee PP, Shanley M, Imahashi N, Acharya S, Bansal R, Bayle JH, Li L, Sekine T, Uddin MH, Gunasekaran M, Ensley E, Vincent B, Rafei H, Aoki T, Heslop HE, Li S, Champlin RE, Rezvani K. Targeting a cytokine checkpoint enhances the fitness of armored cord blood CAR-NK cells. Blood. 2021;137(5):624-636. | PMC7869185
[18] Kuznetsova V, Krishnan V, Costa A, Ren X, Ricketts TD, Patel SB, Connelly AN, Goel P, Knapp JP, Franceski AM, Luca F, Lobo de Figueiredo-Pontes L, Bhatia R, Prabhakar S, Ong ST, Welner RS. Chronic inflammation deters natural killer cell fitness and cytotoxicity in myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2025;9(4):759-773. | View Article
[7] Ingegnere T, Mariotti FR, Pelosi A, et al. Human CAR NK Cells: A New Non-viral Method Allowing High Efficient Transfection and Strong Tumor Cell Killing. Front Immunol. 2019;10:957. | View Article
[9] Bari R, Granzin M, Tsang KS, Roy A, Krueger W, Orentas R, Schneider D, Pfeifer R, Moeker N, Verhoeyen E, Dropulic B, Zimmermann K, Kampmann E, Maetzig T, Modlich U, Baum C, Grez M, Schimmer S, Lamers C, Schambach A. A Distinct Subset of Highly Proliferative and Lentiviral Vector (LV)-Transducible NK Cells Define a Readily Engineered Subset for Adoptive Cellular Therapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2001. | View Article
[14] Huang RS, Lai MC, Shih HA, Lin YJ, Tsai MH, Kuo YY, Hu HT, Chu PY, Lin TY, Su WC. A robust platform for expansion and genome editing of primary human natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 2021;218(3):e20201529. | View Article
[16] Robbins GM, Wang M, Pomeroy EJ, Moriarity BS. Nonviral genome engineering of natural killer cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):350. | View Article
[19] Akimova T, Wang L, Bartosh Z, Christensen LM, Eruslanov E, Singhal S, Aishwarya V, Hancock WW. Antisense targeting of FOXP3+ Tregs to boost anti-tumor immunity. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1426657. | PMC11371716
[6] André P, Denis C, Soulas C, Bourbon-Caillet C, Lopez J, Arnoux T, Bléry M, Bonnafous C, Gauthier L, Morel A, Rossi B, Remark R, Breso V, Bonnet E, Habif G, Guia S, Lalanne AI, Hoffmann C, Lantz O, Fayette J, Boyer-Chammard A, Zerbib R, Dodion P, Ghadially H, Jure-Kunkel M, Morel Y, Herbst R, Narni-Mancinelli E, Cohen RB, Vivier E. Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a Checkpoint Inhibitor that Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Unleashing Both T and NK Cells. Cell. 2018;175(7):1731-1743.e13. | View Article
[10] Basar R, Daher M, Rezvani K. Next-generation cell therapies: the emerging role of CAR-NK cells. Blood Adv. 2020;4(22):5868-5876. | View Article
[15] Gong Y, Klein Wolterink RGJ, Wang J, Bos GMJ, Germeraad WTV. Chimeric antigen receptor natural killer (CAR-NK) cell design and engineering for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):73. | View Article
[17] Moscarelli J, Zahavi D, Maynard R, Weiner LM. The Next Generation of Cellular Immunotherapy: CAR-NK Cells. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28(10):650-656. | View Article

Ready to Engineer Enhanced NK Cells and CAR-NK Therapies?

Discover how AUMsilence enables transfection-free checkpoint blockade, exhaustion prevention, and CAR-NK optimization. Our scientists can help design your NK cell enhancement strategy.