Skip to content
Order

Cell type guide

Mesenchymal stem cells RNA silencing guide

Master RNA silencing in MSCs

Preserve multipotency while achieving gene knockdown

Knockdown Efficiency
70-95% knockdown
Cell Viability
Preserved; target-dependent
Multipotency
Target-dependent

Why MSCs are critical for regenerative medicine and cell therapy

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent stromal cells with therapeutic potential. Isolated from bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and other tissues, MSCs possess the unique ability to differentiate into osteoblasts (bone), adipocytes (fat), and chondrocytes (cartilage), while secreting bioactive factors that modulate immune responses, promote tissue repair, and regulate inflammation.

The therapeutic promise of MSCs lies in their dual capacity: direct tissue regeneration through differentiation and paracrine signaling that orchestrates endogenous repair mechanisms. MSCs secrete growth factors (VEGF, HGF, IGF-1), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β), and immunomodulatory mediators (PGE2, IDO, HLA-G), along with extracellular vesicles carrying proteins, mRNAs and microRNAs. They home to sites of injury through chemokine gradients, modulate immune responses, and contribute to tissue repair. Clinical trials have explored MSCs for osteoarthritis, myocardial infarction, graft-versus-host disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and neurological disorders.

The fundamental challenge: conventional transfection methods compromise MSC stemness and therapeutic properties. Lipofection can be of low efficiency in primary MSCs, and can cause toxicity and trigger differentiation. The cationic lipids induce oxidative stress, alter mitochondrial function, and activate differentiation pathways, resulting in loss of multipotency. Electroporation causes cell death and induces premature senescence, characterized by enlarged morphology, β-galactosidase activity, and growth arrest. Even surviving cells show reduced colony-forming capacity and altered secretome profiles.
AUMsilence sdASO is added to the culture medium with no transfection reagent. AUMsilence sdASOs bind proteins on the cell surface and are taken up by endocytosis, followed by intracellular trafficking; a small fraction escapes endosomes to reach the cytosol and nucleus where target engagement occurs via RNase H1. This approach achieves 70-95% knockdown. No transfection reagent is added and no electric pulse is applied, so the cationic lipids and the membrane damage that can trigger differentiation and senescence are not introduced. Differentiation capacity (trilineage differentiation assays), spindle morphology and plastic adherence, immunomodulatory function (T cell suppression assays) and the senescence markers are read on the treated cells.

This supports studies of regeneration mechanisms (VEGF, HGF, BMP signaling), immunomodulation pathways (IDO, COX-2, iNOS), differentiation regulators (RUNX2, PPARγ, SOX9), senescence and aging (p16, p21, SASP factors), and enhancement strategies in preclinical studies.

  • MSCs are multipotent cells from bone marrow, adipose, umbilical cord with trilineage differentiation capacity
  • Therapeutic mechanisms include direct differentiation and paracrine signaling through growth factors and EVs
  • Conventional transfection can be of low efficiency, and can cost stemness and induce differentiation
  • Electroporation triggers premature senescence and reduces colony-forming capacity
  • Significant donor-to-donor variability in transfection efficiency with conventional methods
  • AUMsilence sdASO silences with no transfection reagent
  • Differentiation capacity read by osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic assays

Critical challenges in MSC transfection

MSCs present unique biological barriers that compromise conventional gene delivery methods:

Loss of multipotency with transfection

Lipofection and electroporation can trigger spontaneous differentiation in MSCs. Cationic lipids may activate intracellular calcium signaling and stress-activated protein kinase pathways (p38 MAPK, JNK) that can induce lineage commitment, particularly toward osteogenic differentiation. Treated cells may show increased alkaline phosphatase activity, upregulation of RUNX2, and in some cases, early mineralization markers even without differentiation-inducing media. This loss of stemness compromises the study of MSC biology, as cells no longer represent true multipotent stromal cells. Colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) capacity frequently shows substantial reduction post-transfection.

High impact

Extreme donor heterogeneity

MSCs from different donors show significant variation in transfection efficiency with identical protocols. This heterogeneity stems from multiple factors including donor age (efficiency typically decreases with age), tissue source (bone marrow vs adipose vs umbilical cord), passage number (efficiency typically drops after passages 3-4), and individual biological variation. Younger donor umbilical cord MSCs may achieve higher transfection efficiency compared to aged donor bone marrow MSCs. This variability makes standardized protocols challenging and often requires optimization for different donor sources.

High impact

Induction of premature senescence

Electroporation and harsh transfection conditions can trigger stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) in MSCs. Treated cells may exhibit senescence hallmarks including enlarged, flattened morphology, increased senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity, upregulation of cell cycle inhibitors (p16INK4a/CDKN2A and p21CIP1/CDKN1A), reduced proliferation or growth arrest, and development of a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) characterized by increased secretion of pro-inflammatory factors including IL-6, IL-8, and matrix metalloproteinases. Senescent MSCs typically show reduced therapeutic efficacy and limited expansion potential for research or clinical applications.

High impact

Compromised immunomodulatory function

Transfection can disrupt MSC immunosuppressive capacity: a key therapeutic mechanism. Lipofection has been reported to reduce IDO (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase) activity, potentially decrease PGE2 secretion, and may impair T cell suppression capacity in mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays. The cellular stress from transfection can alter the MSC secretome, potentially shifting the balance from anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory mediators, with possible increases in cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, or TNF-α. This functional alteration can compromise immunomodulation studies and therapeutic applications.

High impact

Altered secretome and EV production

MSC therapeutic efficacy depends on secreted factors and extracellular vesicles (EVs/exosomes). Transfection can alter this secretome, potentially affecting growth factor secretion (VEGF, HGF, IGF-1, FGF-2), EV size distribution and cargo content (proteins, RNAs, lipids), total EV production levels, and surface marker expression on EVs that determines targeting specificity. Since MSC-EVs are being developed as cell-free therapeutics for various indications, maintaining authentic EV production profiles is important for translational research.

Medium impact

Limited expansion post-transfection

MSCs have finite replicative capacity (Hayflick limit), typically undergoing 15-50 population doublings before senescence depending on source and culture conditions. Transfection stress may accelerate progression toward this limit: cells may show reduced proliferation rates at earlier passages, population doubling time can increase substantially, and clonogenic capacity (CFU-F) frequently decreases. For research requiring extensive expansion or therapeutic applications requiring large cell doses, this limited expansion potential can be a significant constraint.

High impact

Method comparison

Gene silencing methods for MSCs
MethodEfficiencyViabilityProsCons
Lipofection (cationic lipids)LowReducedSimple protocol, commercially availableLoss of stemness, triggers differentiation, high donor variability, compromises therapeutic properties
ElectroporationModerateReducedHigher efficiency than lipofectionInduces senescence, reduces proliferation, alters morphology, expensive equipment
Viral vectors (lentivirus, AAV)HighHigh efficiency, stable expressionInsertional mutagenesis risk, regulatory concerns for clinical use, 2-3 week production
AUMsilence sdASO70-95% knockdownPreserved; target-dependentNo transfection reagent, no electroporation, no viral vectorTransient knockdown (appropriate for functional studies)

Recommended products

AUMsilence sdASO

Gene silencing in MSCs with no transfection reagent

Why AUMsilence sdASOs suit MSCs

AUMsilence sdASOs are added to MSC cultures with no transfection reagent. They bind proteins on the cell surface and are taken up by endocytosis, followed by endosomal escape and RNase H1-mediated target degradation. The stemness markers, the differentiation capacity and the immunomodulatory function that define functional MSCs are read on the treated cells.

Key benefits

  • No transfection required
    Added to the culture medium. No transfection reagent, electroporation, or viral vector is needed.
  • Knockdown efficiency
    Gene silencing across MSC sources: bone marrow, adipose, umbilical cord, and dental pulp MSCs, at 70-95% knockdown.
  • Differentiation capacity
    Osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation are read on the treated cells, by lineage-specific staining and gene expression.
  • Colony formation
    CFU-F capacity is read on the treated cells against a passage-matched untreated control.
  • Passage capability
    No electric pulse is applied, so the premature senescence electroporation can trigger is not introduced. Population doubling time is read across passages against a passage-matched control.
  • Scalable protocol
    No delivery equipment is used, so the protocol scales with the culture volume.

Cell types and applications

  • Primary human MSCs from all tissue sources
  • Differentiation mechanism studies
  • Immunomodulation pathway dissection
  • Senescence and aging research
  • Enhancement strategy studies
  • Exosome/EV cargo modification
  • Disease modeling applications
  • Tissue engineering optimization
  • Preclinical MSC studies

Alternative products

AUMsilence sdASO protocols for MSCs

Optimized protocols for bone marrow, adipose, and umbilical cord MSCs. No transfection reagents required; preserves stemness.

Quick start protocol (all MSC sources)

  1. 01Culture MSCs at 3-5 × 10³ cells/cm² in appropriate medium (DMEM + 10% FBS)
  2. 02Add AUMsilence sdASO directly to culture medium at 10 μM (no transfection reagent)
  3. 03Incubate 48-72 hours at 37°C, 5% CO₂
  4. 04Validate knockdown by qRT-PCR (mRNA at 48h) and Western blot (protein at 72h)
  5. 05Confirm maintained stemness by trilineage differentiation or CFU-F assay

Cell-type-specific protocols

Bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs)

Gold standard MSCs with trilineage differentiation capacity
  1. Step 1: MSC culture setup

    Thaw or passage BM-MSCs (P2-P6 optimal). Seed at 3-5 × 10³ cells/cm² in T75 flask or 6-well plate. Use complete medium: DMEM low glucose + 10% MSC-qualified FBS + 1% Pen/Strep + 2 mM L-glutamine. Allow 24h for attachment and spreading.

    Materials: DMEM low glucose, MSC-qualified FBS, culture vessels

    Note: Use MSCs between passages 2-6. Higher passages show reduced efficiency.

    Timing: Day -1

  2. Step 2: AUMsilence sdASO treatment

    When MSCs reach 50-70% confluence, add AUMsilence sdASO directly to culture medium at 10 μM final concentration. For 10 mL medium in T75 flask, add 100 μL of 1 mM stock. Mix gently by swirling. No medium change needed.

    Materials: AUMsilence sdASO (1 mM stock in nuclease-free water)

    Note: AUMsilence sdASOs are taken up by endocytosis.

    Timing: Day 0

  3. Step 3: Incubation period

    Incubate at 37°C, 5% CO₂ for 48-72h. Monitor daily for confluence and morphology. MSCs should maintain spindle shape and plastic adherence. If approaching 80% confluence, passage as normal (ASO will be diluted but knockdown maintained).

    Materials: Humidified CO₂ incubator

    Note: mRNA knockdown is typically achieved 24-72 hours after treatment. No morphological changes expected.

    Timing: Days 0-3

  4. Step 4: Knockdown validation

    At 48h: harvest subset for qRT-PCR, expect 70-95% knockdown. At 72h: harvest for Western blot or flow cytometry for protein reduction. Save remaining cells for functional assays.

    Materials: RNA extraction kit, qPCR reagents, protein analysis tools

    Note: Include reference genes: GAPDH, ACTB for qPCR; β-actin, GAPDH for Western.

    Timing: Days 2-3

  5. Step 5: Stemness validation

    Perform trilineage differentiation: Osteogenic (21 days, Alizarin Red staining), Adipogenic (14 days, Oil Red O staining), Chondrogenic (21 days, Alcian Blue staining). Or perform CFU-F assay: replate at 100 cells/10cm dish, count colonies after 14 days.

    Materials: Differentiation media kits, staining reagents

    Note: Compare with untreated MSCs differentiated in parallel.

    Timing: Days 3-24

Adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs)

Abundant source with strong proliferation and immunomodulation
  1. Step 1: AD-MSC culture

    Culture AD-MSCs in DMEM/F12 + 10% FBS + 1 ng/mL bFGF. Seed at 4-6 × 10³ cells/cm² (AD-MSCs proliferate faster than BM-MSCs). Allow 24h attachment.

    Materials: DMEM/F12, FBS, bFGF

    Note: AD-MSCs may show higher baseline proliferation rate.

    Timing: Day -1

  2. Step 2: AUMsilence sdASO treatment

    Add AUMsilence sdASO at 10 μM to 60-70% confluent cultures. AD-MSCs may show slightly faster uptake due to higher metabolic activity.

    Materials: AUMsilence sdASO

    Note: Some targets may achieve good knockdown at lower concentrations in AD-MSCs.

    Timing: Day 0

  3. Step 3: Functional validation

    Besides standard knockdown validation, test immunomodulation: co-culture with activated PBMCs (1:10 ratio), measure T cell proliferation suppression.

    Materials: PBMCs, CFSE, flow cytometer

    Note: Measure suppression against untreated AD-MSCs in the same assay.

    Timing: Days 3-5

Umbilical cord MSCs (UC-MSCs)

Young MSCs with highest proliferation and lowest immunogenicity
  1. Step 1: UC-MSC culture

    Culture UC-MSCs in DMEM low glucose + 10% FBS. These cells show rapid proliferation (doubling time 20-30h) and may reach confluence quickly. Seed at 2-3 × 10³ cells/cm².

    Materials: DMEM low glucose, FBS

    Note: UC-MSCs from Wharton's jelly show most consistent properties.

    Timing: Day -1

  2. Step 2: Optimized ASO delivery

    Due to rapid proliferation, UC-MSCs may dilute ASO faster. Consider: dialing up from 10 μM for highly stable targets, or re-dosing every 3 to 5 days if extending culture beyond 72h.

    Materials: AUMsilence sdASO

    Timing: Day 0

  3. Step 3: Extended culture applications

    For long-term studies (>72h): Re-dose every 3 to 5 days. Split cells as needed maintaining ASO in new medium.

    Materials: Standard culture reagents

    Note: Read knockdown at each passage against a non-targeting control.

    Timing: Days 3+

Essential controls

  • Untreated MSCs: Baseline for gene expression and functional assays
    Culture identically without ASO addition
  • Non-targeting control ASO: Control for ASO-specific effects
    Use AUM non-targeting control at same concentration
  • Differentiation control: Verify maintained multipotency
    Perform trilineage differentiation on treated vs untreated MSCs
  • Passage-matched control: Account for passage-related changes
    Use MSCs at same passage number for all experiments

Optimization strategies

Cell density

Recommendation: Treat at 50-70% confluence

Rationale: Allows proliferation during treatment period without overconfluence. Contact inhibition at high density reduces uptake.

Passage number

Recommendation: Use MSCs between P2-P6

Rationale: Early passages maintain stemness. Late passage MSCs (>P8) show reduced uptake and approaching senescence.

ASO concentration

Recommendation: Start at 10 μM, optimize between 5-20 μM

Rationale: Target-dependent. Rapidly turning over mRNAs may need higher concentrations. Stable targets may work at lower ones.

Serum conditions

Recommendation: Maintain 10% FBS during treatment

Rationale: Unlike lipofection, AUMsilence sdASO is added to the serum-containing medium with no medium change. Serum proteins may reduce uptake. Serum starvation is unnecessary and detrimental.

Donor selection

Recommendation: For consistency, use young donor UC-MSCs or established lots

Rationale: Reduces donor-to-donor variability. UC-MSCs show most consistent results across experiments.

Troubleshooting

Low knockdown efficiency (<60%)
Use earlier passage MSCs (P2-P6)
Increase ASO concentration within 5-20 μM
Extend incubation to 72-96h
Treat cells at lower confluence (50-60%)
Design ASOs targeting different regions of transcript
Loss of MSC morphology
Test for contamination
Check passage number (use <P8)
Verify with non-targeting control ASO
Some morphology change expected if targeting cytoskeletal genes
Failed differentiation post-treatment
This confirms on-target effect if gene involved in differentiation
Treat at lower confluence
Use positive control (non-targeting ASO) to verify differentiation capacity
Check MSC surface markers (CD73, CD90, CD105) remain positive
High donor variability
Standardize source (use only BM or only adipose)
Use commercial MSC lots for consistency
Match passage numbers across donors
Consider pooling donors for population studies

Validation methods for MSC studies

Validation covers the target transcript and protein, the MSC surface markers, trilineage differentiation, colony formation and senescence. Where the target itself governs differentiation or immunomodulation, a change in these readouts is the expected phenotype.

Trilineage differentiation assay

Purpose: Gold standard for assessing multipotency
Protocol: After 72h ASO treatment, induce differentiation: Osteogenic (3 weeks, Alizarin Red), Adipogenic (2 weeks, Oil Red O), Chondrogenic (3 weeks, Alcian Blue).
Expected results: Differentiation capacity, compared with untreated controls
Tips: Run in parallel with untreated and non-targeting ASO controls.

Flow cytometry panel

Purpose: Verify MSC identity and knockdown of surface targets
Protocol: Stain for MSC markers: CD73+, CD90+, CD105+ (>95%), CD45-, CD34-, CD14-, CD19-, HLA-DR- (<2%).
Expected results: The MSC surface markers, compared with untreated controls
Tips: Include viability dye. Use isotype controls.

Colony forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F)

Purpose: Assess clonogenic capacity and self-renewal
Protocol: Plate 100-500 treated MSCs in 10cm dish. Culture 14 days. Fix and stain with Crystal Violet. Count colonies >50 cells.
Expected results: CFU-F capacity, compared with untreated controls
Tips: Plate multiple densities to ensure countable colonies.

T cell suppression assay

Purpose: Assess immunomodulatory function
Protocol: Co-culture ASO-treated MSCs with CFSE-labeled activated PBMCs (1:10 ratio). Measure T cell proliferation at 5 days.
Expected results: T cell proliferation, against untreated MSCs in the same assay; where the target is itself immunomodulatory, a change is the expected phenotype
Tips: Pre-license MSCs with IFN-γ for enhanced suppression.

Senescence-associated β-galactosidase

Purpose: Detect induction of senescence
Protocol: Fix cells at pH 6.0. Stain with X-gal substrate overnight. Count blue cells.
Expected results: SA-β-gal-positive cells, counted against untreated MSCs
Tips: Include positive control (H₂O₂-treated MSCs).

qRT-PCR validation

Purpose: Quantify mRNA knockdown
Protocol: Extract RNA at 48h. Reverse transcribe. qPCR with target-specific primers. Normalize to GAPDH, ACTB.
Expected results: 70-95% knockdown, measured as mRNA reduction. Knockdown is target and cell-type dependent.
Tips: Check RNA quality (RIN >8). Run technical triplicates.

Western blot

Purpose: Confirm protein knockdown
Protocol: Harvest at 72h. Lyse in RIPA buffer. Run SDS-PAGE. Probe with specific antibodies.
Expected results: Protein reduction, measured by Western blot or flow cytometry
Tips: Protein knockdown can also be observed from 24 hours after treatment. Where the target protein is long-lived, existing protein must first turn over, so a later time point may be required.

Critical controls for MSC experiments

  • Passage-matched untreated MSCs
    Purpose: Baseline for all measurements
    Use same passage number, culture conditions, and donor.
  • Non-targeting control ASO
    Purpose: ASO-specific effects control
    Same concentration and timing as experimental ASO.
  • Differentiation medium only
    Purpose: Spontaneous differentiation control
    MSCs in differentiation medium without ASO.
  • Multiple donors
    Purpose: Account for donor variability
    Use n≥3 different donors for key experiments.
  • Early vs late passage
    Purpose: Passage effect control
    Compare P3 vs P7 for passage-dependent changes.

Best practices

  • Always verify MSC identity by flow cytometry before experiments
  • Use MSCs between passages 2-6
  • Perform trilineage differentiation to confirm multipotency maintenance
  • Include CFU-F assay to assess clonogenic capacity
  • Test immunomodulatory function if relevant to study goals
  • Monitor for senescence markers especially in extended cultures
  • Validate both mRNA (48h) and protein (72h) knockdown
  • Use multiple donors to ensure reproducibility
  • Document passage number, source tissue, and donor age

Frequently asked questions

Why do conventional transfection methods cause MSCs to lose their stemness?
Lipofection and electroporation create cellular stress that can activate differentiation pathways. Cationic lipids may trigger intracellular calcium signaling and stress-activated protein kinase pathways (p38 MAPK, JNK), which can lead to lineage commitment, particularly toward osteogenic differentiation. Electroporation induces oxidative stress and membrane damage that may trigger premature senescence. These methods can disrupt the balance of transcription factors that maintain multipotency, including reduced expression of stemness markers and upregulation of lineage-specific factors. AUMsilence sdASO is taken up by endocytosis, with no transfection reagent and no electric pulse, so the calcium signaling, the oxidative stress and the membrane damage those methods can cause are not introduced.
How does AUMsilence sdASO avoid the stresses that cause differentiation?
AUMsilence sdASOs bind proteins on the cell surface and are taken up by endocytosis, without transfection reagents. After endocytosis, a small fraction of ASOs escape endosomes to reach the cytosol and nucleus where they engage targets via RNase H1. No transfection reagent is added, so the stress responses, the calcium flux and the oxidative damage that can cause differentiation are not introduced by the delivery step. The stemness markers (CD73, CD90, CD105) and trilineage differentiation are read on the treated cells.
Can I use AUMsilence sdASO in MSCs from different tissue sources?
Yes. AUMsilence sdASO is added to the medium in the same way for MSCs from bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord and Wharton's jelly, dental pulp, and placenta. Knockdown is read in each source, because conventional methods show variation between them.
What passage number MSCs work best with AUMsilence sdASO?
The usual working range is passages 2-6. Early passage MSCs (P2-P3) often show highest efficiency and maintain best differentiation capacity. Late passage MSCs (>P8) approaching senescence may show reduced uptake. Unlike electroporation, which can accelerate senescence, AUMsilence sdASO applies no electric pulse, so that cause is not introduced. Population doubling time is read across passages.
How long does knockdown last in proliferating MSCs?
Knockdown duration depends on MSC proliferation rate and target stability. mRNA knockdown is typically achieved 24-72 hours after treatment and gradually recovers over 5-7 days as ASOs are diluted through cell division. Proliferating MSCs may need a further dose every 3 to 5 days: rapidly proliferating UC-MSCs (24h doubling time) toward the short end of that range, slower BM-MSCs (48h doubling time) toward the long end. Protein knockdown depends on half-life; where the target protein is long-lived, a later time point may be required.
Can AUMsilence sdASO be used for MSC differentiation studies?
Yes. AUMsilence sdASO is used for dissecting differentiation mechanisms. Lineage-specific transcription factors (RUNX2 for osteogenesis, PPARγ for adipogenesis, SOX9 for chondrogenesis) can be knocked down to block or redirect differentiation. Alternatively, silence negative regulators to enhance specific lineages. No transfection reagent is added, so lineage commitment is set by the culture conditions rather than by the delivery step.
Does AUMsilence sdASO affect MSC immunomodulatory properties?
IDO activity, PGE2 secretion and T cell suppression are read on the treated cells against a non-targeting control, which is what shows whether an unrelated knockdown has changed them. Targeting IDO1, PTGS2, IL6 or another factor then dissects the immunomodulatory mechanisms, and a change in that factor is the expected phenotype.
What is the optimal cell density for treating MSCs?
Treat MSCs at 50-70% confluence. This allows proliferation during the 48-72h treatment period without reaching overconfluence. At <40% confluence, MSCs may show reduced viability. At >80% confluence, contact inhibition reduces proliferation and ASO uptake. For a T75 flask, seed 5-7.5 × 10⁵ cells and treat the next day when cells are well-spread but subconfluent.
Can I use AUMsilence sdASO in 3D culture or on scaffolds?
Yes. AUMsilence sdASO is added in the same way to 3D culture systems, including pellet cultures for chondrogenesis, scaffold-seeded MSCs for bone tissue engineering, hydrogel-encapsulated MSCs, and spheroid cultures. Add AUMsilence sdASO directly to culture medium at 10 μM. For thick constructs, consider a slightly higher concentration or longer incubation, and read knockdown in the construct itself.
How do I validate that multipotency is maintained after knockdown?
Validate on five readouts: (1) Trilineage differentiation: induce osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation and confirm with lineage-specific staining, (2) Flow cytometry: verify MSC markers remain positive (CD73, CD90, CD105 >95%), (3) CFU-F assay: assess colony-forming capacity vs untreated controls, (4) Proliferation: confirm normal population doubling time, (5) Morphology: check for maintained spindle shape without senescence-associated enlargement.
Can AUMsilence sdASO target multiple genes simultaneously in MSCs?
Yes. Multiple ASOs can be combined for pathway dissection or synthetic phenotypes. For dual or triple knockdown, keep the combined concentration within 5-20 μM. Higher total concentrations may reduce viability. Always include single-knockdown controls to understand individual contributions and verify no antagonistic effects between ASOs.
Is AUMsilence sdASO compatible with large-scale MSC expansion?
Yes. Adding AUMsilence sdASO to the medium fits large-scale expansion, with no delivery equipment. No transfection reagent enters the culture. The knockdown is transient, so no permanent genetic change is made. Many MSC expansion protocols already use similar culture conditions.

Order, or talk to a scientist

Get guidance on MSC gene silencing strategies. A scientist reviews the target, the MSC source and the readout before the order.

For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.