Ludlow et al. · Nature Communications · 2018
NOVA1 regulates hTERT splicing and cell growth in non-small cell lung cancer
Ludlow Andrew T., Wong Mandy Sze, Robin Jerome D., Batten Kimberly, Yuan Laura, Lai Tsung-Po, Dahlson Nicole, Zhang Lu, Mender Ilgen, Tedone Enzo, Sayed Mohammed E., Wright Woodring E., Shay Jerry W.
The study
What was asked, and what was found
Ludlow et al., Nature Communications, 2018, asked what decides whether the telomerase catalytic subunit hTERT is spliced into its active full length form or into an inactive isoform that skips two exons, and answered it with the splicing factor NOVA1. A screen of 528 small interfering RNA pools against an hTERT minigene, crossed with expression correlations across lung cancer lines, narrowed the field to four splicing factors, and NOVA1 was chosen from those four as the only one whose expression is tissue restricted. Knocking it down shifted the transcript to the inactive isoform, cut telomerase activity and shortened telomeres, and crosslinking placed NOVA1 on a 258 base pair element inside intron 8 called direct repeat 8.
The oligonucleotide experiment sits at the end of that argument. An antisense oligonucleotide covering 19 nucleotides at one end of that element, including one of its binding motifs, was applied at 50 nM for 48 hours to two lung cancer lines chosen as a matched pair: one that expresses NOVA1 and one that does not. In the line with the factor, splicing shifted toward the exon skipped isoform. In the line without it, nothing moved. That contrast is what showed the element is a splicing enhancer only when its factor is present, and it agrees with what deleting the element from the genome did.
Two cautions belong with any use of this paper. AUM is not named anywhere in it. The attribution rests entirely on the chemistry named once in a supplementary figure legend, which is AUM's own. And the paper disagrees with itself on the statistics for that panel: the main text calls the shift significant and the supplementary legend reports the test as not significant across three biological replicates. The paper also never describes how the oligo was delivered.
Key findings
- An AUMsplice oligonucleotide covering a 19 nucleotide stretch at one end of a splicing enhancer inside intron 8 of the telomerase transcript shifted splicing toward the isoform that skips exons 7 and 8, in the lung cancer line that expresses the splicing factor NOVA1.(Results, Fig. Supplementary 5J and 5K)
- The same oligo did nothing in a lung cancer line that lacks that splicing factor, which is the comparison that gave the result its meaning: the element only matters when the factor is there to bind it.(Results, Deletion or mutation of NOVA1 binding shifts hTERT splicing)
- Deleting the same region from the genome, or mutating its seven binding motifs, pushed three cell lines almost entirely to the skipped isoform, which is the genetic counterpart of what the oligo did chemically.(Discussion)
- The wider study established why that splice choice matters: reducing the splicing factor pushed the transcript to the inactive isoform, cut telomerase activity and progressively shortened telomeres.(Introduction)
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.